FIGHT FOR FOUR MARKS & MEDSTEAD                   NEWS UPDATE

"Striving for fair and responsible planning in Four Marks and Medstead"

NEWS UPDATE Last updated Friday 6th August 2010

News Headlines

Garden Grabbing concerns raised by new figures (05/08/10)

Fight4FourMarks four year battle to object to in-appropriate windfall sites development has been supported by government statistics, and the recent changes to PPS3 Planning Policies.

New figures have laid bare concerns over the dramatic increase in the number of 'gardens grabbed' for development in the last 12 years. Decentralisation Minister Greg Clark said the statistics show the Government was right to take immediate action to prevent unwanted garden grabbing by changing the planning rules.

The percentage of new homes built on previously residential land - which includes back gardens - has increased to 25 per cent, up 14 percentage points since 1997, when only one in ten homes was built on similar land. In the South East the average rise was from 16% to 32%, but in EHDC it has almost doubled to 48% (for the full national analysis by local authority click here).

Last month, Greg Clark changed the planning rules (PPS3) to give councils new powers to prevent unwanted garden grabbing by taking gardens out of the brownfield category that includes derelict factories and disused railway sidings. EHDC, like many councils, has been left frustrated at the increasing amount of inappropriate development on gardens which they have been unable to prevent. Taking gardens out of the brownfield category can dramatically transform councils' ability to prevent unwanted development on gardens where local people object and protect the character of their neighbourhoods.

Allocated RESERVE SITE North of Brislands Lane (31/07/10)

The public exhibition on Friday 23rd July was a big disappointment lacking in any real details, with only poor quality draft site plans available. The few glossy information sheets had in some cases incorrect information on them (a commuter station in FM !). The proposed 130 dwellings on the 4.35 hectare site is far too high - EHDC stated 90 dwellings in the Development Brief, and with PPS3's 30 dph density required removed recently by the Government, this proposal is a gross over-development. We await a formal application and some real details to look at. There was no drainage report (or consultant in attendance), and also no highways report to look at; consultants from Persimmon's agents were unable to offer any real information and the Persimmon Homes' representative left early before many local residents were home from work and able to get to the Village Hall. It was hardly a successful or wide public consultation and this will be recorded with EHDC Planning Officers, the District Councillor and Parish Council.

Some specific issues are :

* far too limited public open spaces; 

* the affordable housing % shown on the map was 49 out of 130 - hardly 40%;

* the primary vehicle access is too narrow and is a disaster just waiting to happen (as per Treloar Heights house fires);

* there was no drainage survey to see (neither sewage or run-off surface water)

* highways access into and through the Barratt baseline site and ultimately to the A31 will be a nightmare scenario in reality (whatever academic theoretical report the Highways consultant and HCC may come up with - as has been proved time again the reality is very different).

 
* the Sustainabilty presentation sheet claimed residents would be able to access local facilities and services (some limited services as we all know) and employment opportunities without having to rely on a car (ha ha - there are very limited employment opportunities in Four Marks itself and the vast majority of the population commutes and shops by car to Alton, Winchester, Guilford, Reading, Southampton/Portsmouth and London (by train via Alton station). 
 
* the Sustainabilty sheet showed a number of bus routes (currently we have the 64/X64 which was shortened to Alton-Winchester only) and which has start / end times that make it useless for Alton train commuters. 
 
* perhaps the most amusing sustainability claim was that the Four Marks & Medstead Train Station offers connections to London-Southampton. Any such commuter connections ended in the 1950s and the station only services a tourist attraction steam railway called the Watercress Line, which is not a commuter railway to either city (just between Alton to Alresford at weekends and off peak times in the summer). Very poor research indeed by the Planning Consultants.  

Persimmon Homes      Pro Vision (Planning)      Pro Vision Newsletters

FMW Consultancy (Highways)     Tribach Associates (Drainage)   

EHDC Development Brief    Reserve Site Map     Four Marks Parish Council


EHDC launch NEW COMMUNITY PLANNING WEB SITE & FACEBOOK PAGE

PlanningResource      Comm & Local Govt      RTPI     Planning Aid

15/07/2010 Greg Clark dispatches unnecessary building targets click here
24/06/2010 The future of local planning click here
09/06/2010 'Garden grabbing' to be curbed  click here
09/06/2010 ‘Garden Grabbing’  NFU Mutual          click here
09/06/2010 Stopping Garden Grabbing & Housing Crisis click here
09/06/2010 Move to end 'garden-grabbing' house building click here
17/06/2010 ‘Garden grabbing’ powers welcome click here
08/06/2010 Good Practice Advice on Pre-Application Discussions click here

June 2010 changes to PPS3 Garden Grabbing policies here

Monday 19th July 2010

NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY IN FOUR MARKS

It has been a quiet year or so, but we are seeing increased activity in our village from potential site developers. An immediate event is regarding the North of Brislands Lane allocated (reserve) site.

Persimmon Homes are holding a pre-application public exhibition at Four Marks Village Hall on Friday 23rd July 2010 between 2pm & 8pm. Do go along to let them and their various consultants know what you think (objectively & unemotionally) about their plans.

Click here to see the F4FM formal invitation from Julian Higgins of Pro Vision Planning Consultants

EHDC Development Brief                       Reserve Site Map


From 2009 : Reserve Site, North of Brislands Lane

Local Plan Approved Reserve Site, North of Brislands Lane

As this is a Reserve Site in the adopted EHDC Local Plan, we have little choice about development taking place at some time in the future ONCE A NEED IS SHOWN - so unfortunately we cannot object to it as an overall plan, only the details. 

This is only in a very early pre-Planning Stage. Although there may have been pre- application discussions (developers in consultation with EHDC, which is normal practice), there is no actual planning application made so far.

An EHDC Development Brief for developers is out for public consultation until 9th October. The Development Brief is prepared as additional planning guidance and sets out the way EHDC wishes to see the site developed with an emphasis on high quality and sustainable development. It will provide the basis on which  planning applications can be submitted and assessed.

During the Brief's consultation period anyone can make their views known about the Development Brief itself by 9th October 2009. Comments or questions can be made to either Four Marks Parish Council at their public open meeting on 9th September in the Village Hall at 19:30, or direct to EHDC on their web site under Planning or to us at Fight4FourMarks.    

EHDC Development Brief                       Reserve Site Map


EHDC Local Development Framework Consultation

This replaces the Local Plan (Second Review).

For more detailed information click here


2007 Ruislip-Northwood Stop garden Grab campaign click here


WANTED - INTERESTED LOCAL PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT THE FUTURE

These are our communities and our families' future, so why don't you get involved ?  Some of us have been working hard to stop in-appropriate over-development in Four Marks, Medstead & Chawton. We don't want to become small towns with a greatly increased population, but yet no facilities or infrastructure. We can only be effective in fighting in-appropriate planning applications being made in Four Marks, Medstead & Chawton by everyone working together, and using objective planning arguments - so far in support of EHDC Planning Department we have great success, including FOUR Developer Appeals dismissed by National Planning Inspectors in 2007.

Contact us at fight4fourmarks@yahoo.co.uk with your name address and telephone #


To See The Latest Planning News in Four Marks & Medstead go to News Update

To see the detailed applications & links to EHDC's web site go to Development Applications


F4FM objects (and will continue to object) to inappropriate & high density developments, which our village infrastructure cannot support. We do (and will) support well-designed & affordable developments that meet the needs of our community and are in line with government, regional, county, district and parish Development Plans. We support all efforts to generate local employment and economic growth for our community.